Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| report [2022/06/20 00:17] – [7.4 Structural Design] team2 | report [2022/06/28 10:49] (current) – [7.7 Tests and Results] team2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 532: | Line 532: | ||
| ** Risk assessment** - Evaluation of risks, depends on the risk preference of the decision maker. As a risk-neutral company, our decisions are based primarily on expected values. | ** Risk assessment** - Evaluation of risks, depends on the risk preference of the decision maker. As a risk-neutral company, our decisions are based primarily on expected values. | ||
| - | The following tables are identified risks regarding to the project and product. | ||
| - | |||
| - | <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | ||
| - | <table tlabel6> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | ^ Numbering ^ Description ^ Category ^ Causes ^ Possible consequences ^ Affected stakeholders ^ Probability of occurrence ^ Influence ^ | ||
| - | | R01 | failure of parts | technical | technical issues | unusability of the product | users, project team | medium | creating stress simulation | | ||
| - | | R02 | delivery delay | possible | significant | guaranteed delivery on time | | ||
| - | | R03 | too costly | possible | moderate | make or buy decision, finding a cheaper alternative, | ||
| - | | R04 | public has hurdles to participate| unlikely | severe | strong study of the state of the art | | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | |||
| - | Numbering ^ Description ^ Category ^ Causes ^ Possible consequences ^ Affected stakeholders ^ Probability of occurrence ^ Influence | ||
| **Risk management** - Development of strategies to manage risk. The measures can be preventive or corrective. The following risk strategies are distinguished: | **Risk management** - Development of strategies to manage risk. The measures can be preventive or corrective. The following risk strategies are distinguished: | ||
| Line 551: | Line 537: | ||
| **Risk monitoring** - Review of the planned measures and their effect as well as the further development of risks. | **Risk monitoring** - Review of the planned measures and their effect as well as the further development of risks. | ||
| The individual processes do not represent completed procedures, but must be monitored regularly and re-evaluated when new information about a risk is available. | The individual processes do not represent completed procedures, but must be monitored regularly and re-evaluated when new information about a risk is available. | ||
| + | The following tables are identified risks regarding to the project and product. | ||
| - | The biggest challenge of a project | + | <WRAP center centeralign 750px> |
| - | With a well-developed risk management, the chance | + | <table tlabel7> |
| - | + | < | |
| - | + | ^ Risk Event ^ Probability ^ Impact Rating ^ Risk Handling ^ | |
| - | + | | Deadlines are not kept | possible | significant | creating sprint plant to keep all members updated with the current tasks, finding out the origin | |
| - | + | | Lack of appropriate prior knowledge to gather expertise promptly | very likely | significant | assign different expert roles to each person, who informs their group members about their research and transfers learned skills | | |
| - | ==== 3.7.1 Product Level ==== | + | | Coordination problems between the team members | possible | moderate | weekly meetings incl. writing minutes that are published in the shared cloud | |
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | ||
| Line 571: | Line 560: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | ==== 3.7.2 Project Level ==== | ||
| - | <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | ||
| - | <table tlabel7> | ||
| - | < | ||
| - | ^ Risk Event ^ Probability ^ Impact Rating ^ Risk Handling ^ | ||
| - | | Deadlines are not kept | possible | significant | creating sprint plant to keep all members updated with the current tasks, finding out the origin of the delay, weekly meetings | | ||
| - | | Lack of appropriate prior knowledge to gather expertise promptly | very likely | significant | assign different expert roles to each person, who informs their group members about their research and transfers learned skills | | ||
| - | | Coordination problems between the team members | possible | moderate | weekly meetings incl. writing minutes that are published in the shared cloud | | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | <WRAP centeralign> | + | The biggest challenge of a project is that due to existing risks a project’s success can be achieved completely, partially or not at all. |
| - | <figure figlabel13> | + | With a well-developed risk management, the chance of achieving the project goal is increased and risks can be minimised through early and effective identification. Furthermore, |
| - | {{ :risk_assessment.png? | + | |
| - | < | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| Line 603: | Line 578: | ||
| The last external stakeholders identified are the suppliers. Their importance is great because the manufacturing of the product relie almost them. From the raw materials, to the shaping of parts, | The last external stakeholders identified are the suppliers. Their importance is great because the manufacturing of the product relie almost them. From the raw materials, to the shaping of parts, | ||
| ==== - Sprint Outcomes ==== | ==== - Sprint Outcomes ==== | ||
| - | //To be added. Include | + | The following tables show the weekly sprints, indicating |
| <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | ||
| Line 812: | Line 787: | ||
| There is potential for improvement above all in a more balanced distribution of workload over the entire course of the project. The joint focus on finding a solution in the event of time bottlenecks should be emphasized positively. | There is potential for improvement above all in a more balanced distribution of workload over the entire course of the project. The joint focus on finding a solution in the event of time bottlenecks should be emphasized positively. | ||
| ==== - Conclusion ==== | ==== - Conclusion ==== | ||
| - | //To be added. Provide here the conclusions | + | Well-structured project management serves as a key element to ensure a high-quality project that is completed on time and within budget. It is important to live project management throughout |
| + | |||
| + | In the following | ||
| ===== - Marketing ===== | ===== - Marketing ===== | ||
| Line 1546: | Line 1523: | ||
| **Performance test** | **Performance test** | ||
| - | The technological performance of software was assessed using the Google Developers service [[https:// | + | The technological performance of software was assessed using the Google Developers service [[https:// |
| - | + | <WRAP center centeralign 750px> | |
| - | <figure figlabel41> | + | <table tlabel29> |
| - | {{ :: | + | < |
| - | < | + | ^ Performance Indicator ^ Screen Application ^ Mobile Application ^ |
| - | </ | + | | Overall Score | 92 | 90 | |
| - | <figure figlabel42> | + | | First Contentful Paint | 0.7s | 0.7s | |
| - | {{ : | + | | Time to Interactive | 1.4s | 1.5s | |
| - | < | + | | Speed Index | 1.0s | 1.1s | |
| - | </figure> | + | | Total Blocking Time | 10ms | 20ms | |
| + | | Largest Contentful Paint | 2.8s | 2.0s | | ||
| + | | Cumulative Layout Shift | 0.002s | 0 | | ||
| + | </table> | ||
| + | </WRAP> | ||